Zum Inhalt der Seite gehen


Rezound with a small update for Qt5 support looks quite decent.

Maybe a good alternative to Audacity?


Als Antwort auf falktx

I think it needs some good tools/plugins to really work doesn't it?. Good metering would be nice. Broadcast tools would also help for loudness stuff. But yyeah, it looks clean and crisp
Als Antwort auf Open Mastering 🎚️🎧🎛️

well "just" bridge in carla with that and we have access to pretty much all plugins we want.
Carla has a native API that allows to be reused inside other tools, Zrythm is already making use of this.

So many possibilities, so little time...
Als Antwort auf falktx

Is the audio engine up to par with more recent softwares or is it irrelevant?
Als Antwort auf Open Mastering 🎚️🎧🎛️

no idea, that would require digging a lot deeper.
It is an old project that has been barely been kept up to date, so I would guess not much... but it is pure speculation of course.
Als Antwort auf falktx

I'd love to support a second FOSS audio editor. If you ever want to tackle this, I'd support however i can
Als Antwort auf Open Mastering 🎚️🎧🎛️

that is very appreciated, but a few people alone are not enough.
I would love to work on these things full time, but without a massive audience for support, it won't happen.

So for now I can help on maintenance, providing a way to do automated builds.
Someone else on IRC is trying to get a few more things working on the Qt5 build.

Are you familiar with AppImage or similar frameworks? Or do you know anyone who is? (and is willing to help, of course)
Als Antwort auf falktx

It's "just" packaging right?
I'd be willing to learn it and maintain it.
Als Antwort auf Open Mastering 🎚️🎧🎛️

right, it is mostly packaging. though stuff like AppImage can involve using scripts for certain tasks.
Also, AppImage is just one of many possible formats. I do not know which one is the best, and it is better to not start this discussion here anyway, everyone has their own opinion and preferences.
Als Antwort auf Be

The Kwave maintainer has made commits in KDE's GitLab as recently as 6 months ago: https://invent.kde.org/multimedia/kwave/-/commits/master/
Als Antwort auf falktx

I have not heard of this program before. It looks abandoned? Did you just build it with Qt5? Or was there a new release?
Als Antwort auf Be

Reviving an abandoned Qt program seems like a better idea than forking Audacity.
Als Antwort auf falktx

@falktx Doesn't seem to have multitrack, right? As single track alternative to audacity I use ocenaudio on linux or as multitrack I'm trying to switch to qtractor now.
Als Antwort auf Torsten

it is not, it can sorta load multiple files but not in the way you expect.

it can play all loaded files concurrently but you have to start/stop/loop/whatever them independently, and there's only one waveview displayed at a time
Als Antwort auf falktx

I would suspect serious technical debt due to an assumption of only having one file playing at a time. IIUC it took years for Mixxx to overcome an assumption of having two decks. It might be easier to start from scratch.
Als Antwort auf Be

It might not be so bad. I think it's worth digging into the code to find out. At least I don't see two decades of vendored and forked dependencies.
Als Antwort auf Torsten

I don't see the source code for ocenaudio anywhere...
Als Antwort auf falktx

I had a 10 minute play, there's certainly room for work to be done, looks like the Jack engine needs to be rebuilt for one thing, but a solid base to build on

Once conserning thing: the project doesn't seem to have a license
Als Antwort auf SEGFAULT

code like https://github.com/ddurham2/rezound/blob/master/src/misc/CPath.h implies it is GPLv2+
author likely just forgot to put a LICENSE file on the root folder.

comment headers with a clear license override the global project one, so this should be fine.